Average user rating1.3out of 5Overview
|
The Whirlpool LHW0050PQ is an energy efficient front loading washing machine that has plenty of installation options. It can be installed under a counter, stacked with its matching dryer, or used as a freestanding washing machine.
|
|
|
Quick Specs
| Capacity |
2.9 cu/ ft |
| Presets |
11 Wash Presets, including: Hand Wash, Soaking |
| Extra Settings |
Quick Wash • Heavy Duty • Extra Rinsing |
| Washing Method |
Activator |
| Annual Energy Consumption |
212 kWHrs |
| Depth |
21.38 in. |
| Height |
33.25 in. |
| Width |
23.38 in. |
Full Review
The Whirlpool LHW0050PQ is an energy efficient front loading washing machine with lots of features. The 2.9 cu/ ft capacity is capable of washing up to 18 pounds of laundry at one time. This is suitable for most families.
There are 11 presets on the Whirlpool LHW0050PQ including Hand Wash, and Soaking. There are also settings for quick wash, heavy duty, and extra rinsing. These presets are suitable for almost any type of laundry load and can be further customized with spin speeds to a maximum of 1200 rpm, four temperature levels, and automatic water level adjustment.
There are both electronic and rotary controls on the Whirlpool LHW0050PQ and an end of cycle signal will alert you when the washing machine is finished. The standard fabric softener dispenser and detergent dispenser are supplemented with a pre-wash dispenser, but there is no bleach dispenser which could be a problem for some people.
The Whirlpool LHW0050PQ is very easy on electricity and water use. The money saved on electricity and water bills will more than make up for the slightly extra cost of this washing machine.
Front loading washing machines are usually a bit noisier than their counterparts, but the Whirlpool LHW0050PQ is certainly within a reasonable noise level. Keep in mind that the washing machine must be accurately leveled in order to avoid vibration during the spin cycles.
The Whirlpool LHW0050PQ has a stainless steel tub and is only available in white. It is a stylish machine comes with a one year Parts and Labor warranty.
In Use
The Whirlpool LHW0050PQ is a compact front loading washing machine. Front loaders have the reputation of being on the noisy side, but this model is certainly within reason. Keep in mind that front loaders must be accurate at the level to avoid vibration during the spin cycle, and the LHW0050PQ is no exception. For a compact washing machine, the LHW0050PQ handles a surprising amount of laundry does a very good job washing clothes. The number of presets is suitable for most washing needs, but some people may find them to be limited. For example, the length of the wash cycles cannot be adjusted, and some people may prefer slightly longer washing times. Overall though, this is a great little performer that does a super job washing clothes.
Washing Machines Review rating: 4.4
Buying Information
Available from:
| | | Average user rating | Average user rating from: 1 users
| |
| | | | | | All User Reviews | |
|
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful
Here are my concerns:
- obviously, it positively sickens me that I would have to spend $800 to repair a washing machine that is only 2 1/2 years old. The washing machine was not cheap. I thought I was buying quality. This obviously wasn't the case.
- upon learning that the replacement part would cost so much, I would have just bought a new washing machine (not from Whirlpool!). However, the repair shop explained to me that my stackable Whirlpool dryer was only going to fit on top of a Whirlpool washing machine. So, to replace the washing machine would mean that I would also have to sell my dryer. Weighing the pros and cons of the situation, I decided to fix the washing machine even though it positively sickened me to give Whirlpool another cent. I find it equally repulsive that, when one buys a stackable unit, they're basically stuck if one part of it fails (this would be more acceptable, of course, if the machines lasted considerably longer than 2 1/2 years).
- when the repair person first brought the replacement part to my house, he mentioned that the replacement part was now being sold as part of a kit (control board with motor board - that's how they had purchased it from Whirlpool). He mentioned that, when parts come in a kit, it usually means the company has had problems with the part (so they sell the parts in a way that makes the many repair jobs easier). If Whirlpool has been having problems with this part, I have to wonder why they wouldn't instead compensate customers who'd bought the part in the first place. The fact that the replacement part had *exactly* the same problems as the original part makes me wonder the exact same thing.
- I have to wonder how much Whirlpool is making off of these replacement parts. It is absurd to me that any washing machine part should cost $500 - unless, of course, the company selling the part is marking up its value considerably. I really have to wonder if this isn't part of the company's business model: selling units that fail shortly after the warranty expires and then selling the parts required to fix the units at a jacked up price.
- related to the above point, the $500 replacement part has a guarantee of 3 months. Three months for something that cost over $500! In other words, if the part goes again in 4 months (and the machine's history tells me that this is a great possibility), I am completely out of luck again. I have never - ever - spent $500 on something that didn't come with a guarantee that wasn't at least a year long. You can buy a $30 toaster anywhere and it comes with at least a 1 year warranty! But I guess, considering what I believe to be their business model (see above), I'm not really that surprised by this.
- I am extremely confused by Whirlpool technical support's involvement in this. You would think that the nature of their involvement was an admission that something in the machine had caused the $500 part to go in the first place. This is especially suspect since they offered another part for free to try to make that determination. I just have to wonder why I should have had to pay $800 to replace a part that was caused by a fault with the machine in the first place.
- I have spent $800 and been without a working washing machine for over a month now. That alone is ridiculous. But, to add potential injury to insult, I now have a washing machine with parts that have proven to short out because of a deficiency with the machine. In other words, I now have to wonder if my washing machine is going to catch fire every time I use it!
I have written to Whirlpool 3 times now about this situation. All they really told me in return was that they appreciate my business and that they have added my concerns to their database. I don't think I need to explain to anyone what little consolation that has given me...
Was this review helpful to you?
